Monthly Archives: June 2017

Case author relationships under the microscope

iStock-609707002.jpg

Times Higher Education (1-7 June) investigated persistent claims from PhD students of ill treatment at the hands of their supervisors.

The feature reports claims of sexism, institutionalised bullying through an imbalanced relationship between supervisor and those being supervised, and PhD students being seen widely as a cheap workforce.

Kathleen Barker, an experienced supervisor and clinical assistant professor at the University of Washington School of Public Health, identifies authorship as one area in which good supervisors seek to establish clarity as early as possible: “Who writes the papers? How is authorship decided? Will you protect your people in authorship disputes with collaborating groups, or will you sacrifice a trainee to keep last authorship for yourself?”

woman writing her notebookI meet many PhD or Masters student authors in the course of presenting our annual awards for case writing. I have been impressed by the regard in which they are held and by how senior lead authors have been at pains to make sure that student authors and collaborators are acknowledged properly.

But I wonder how often PhD students contribute to researching or writing cases without being given proper recognition as a co-author?

In another Times Higher Education article – this time from the edition 18-24 May – by Mark Hayter and Roger Watson of the Faculty of Health Science at the University of Hull, explores the question of whether or not it is right for PhD supervisors to publish with their students.

While recognising that some academics, particularly in the social sciences, see supervisors publishing with students, as predatory, Hayter and Watson do not. They argue strongly in favour of publishing jointly authored works as a supervisor’s ‘moral responsibility’ to help their students publish.

Where do you stand?

Leave a comment

Filed under Business schools, Case method, Case writing, Research

Business case studies have their place in law

law

The early practitioners of the case method drew a lot of their inspiration from the study of law. In particular from the adversarial nature of common law jurisdictions and the requirement for students to study by analysing and debating case law as it was created by the courts.

So it is interesting that American legal experts, Olga V. Mack and Katia Bloom, are now arguing for the use of business style case studies in law degrees.

They see this as a way of improving the acquisition and development of the skills displayed by every successful lawyer: emotional intelligence, collaboration, and the ability to analyse risks constructively.

Never mind that every lawyer also operates as a business.

Colorful umbrellas in the sky, street decoration. Colorful backgroundWithin the diversity of The Case Centre’s collection are many cases focusing on management issues specific to particular industries: arts management, veterinary science, science and technology, fashion and design, just to name a few examples. And not all business skills acquired are limited to running a business. What Olga and Katia have spotted is that business skills are also interpersonal.

Have you tried using business cases outside of the traditional business degree?

Links to specialist collections distributed by The Case Centre:

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized